Sheep Show Shines: WSF Raises Record-Breaking $6.5 Million
Who really funds wildlife conservation? Any social media post that ends with “#conservation” stakes its own claim, often serving as a rallying cry for hunters to showcase their role in widespread efforts. But the logistics of how funds are really generated and where they are allocated aren’t so black and white. However, amidst restless discussions and debates, one organization stands out for its remarkable contributions and speaks as a testament to hunting’s importance in wildlife conservation: the Wild Sheep Foundation, which just broke all-time records with the 2024 Sheep Show.
To the untrained eye, it might seem contradictory to assert that hunting is conservation, and understandably so. Yet, a closer look shows that hunting gives itself to conservation in ways beyond targeting an invasive or overpopulated species. You won’t find the answer in the animals harvested, but rather in the money spent. Every hunter contributes when they purchase a license, permit, or tag. But these expenses vary greatly by state and species, and the far end of that spectrum was on display at the Sheep Show back in January.
Over the course of three nights at the Sheep Show, the Wild Sheep Foundation auctioned off 29 tags for over $6.5 million, $5.7 million of which went directly back into state wildlife agencies. We have a table to break down the numbers of the auction, but at first glance, a few stand out. Colorado auctioned off a bighorn sheep permit for a record $600,000 — $540,000 went directly to the state for its sheep program. New Mexico auctioned off a Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep permit for another $600,000 and injected the same $540,000 back into its sheep program.
Sheep Show Auction
| AUCTION | # | AGENCY | BID AMOUNT | SPLIT | DUE AGENCY | DUE WSF |
| THURSDAY | ||||||
| TH | 10 | Nevada Dept of Wildlife – Antelope | $55,000.00 | 100.00% | $55,000.00 | $0.00 |
| TH | 20 | NE Game & Parks Commission – Elk Tag | $140,000.00 | 85.00% | $119,000.00 | $21,000.00 |
| TH | 28 | WSF-Wyoming – Commissioner Tag | $37,500.00 | 90.00% | $33,750.00 | $3,750.00 |
| TH | 34 | RMGA – CO Goat Tag | $47,500.00 | 90.00% | $42,750.00 | $4,750.00 |
| TH | 49 | WSF-Wyoming – Shiras Moose | $85,000.00 | 90.00% | $76,500.00 | $8,500.00 |
| TH | 59 | Arizona Antelope Foundation | $90,000.00 | 100.00% | $90,000.00 | $0.00 |
| FRIDAY | ||||||
| FR | 07 | Oregon Dept of Fish & Wildlife – Antelope | $32,500.00 | 90.00% | $29,250.00 | $3,250.00 |
| FR | 12 | Navajo Department of Fish & Game – Bighorn | $75,000.00 | 90.00% | $67,500.00 | $7,500.00 |
| FR | 18 | Washington Dept of Fish & Wildlife – CA Bighorn | $270,000.00 | 90.00% | $243,000.00 | $27,000.00 |
| FR | 24 | WSF-Wyoming – Shiras Moose | $90,000.00 | 90.00% | $81,000.00 | $9,000.00 |
| FR | 30 | CA Department Game & Fish – Desert Tag | $180,000.00 | 95.00% | $171,000.00 | $9,000.00 |
| FR | 36 | NM Dept Game, Fish & Wildlife – Enhancement | $380,000.00 | 90.00% | $342,000.00 | $38,000.00 |
| FR | 41 | Texas Parks & Wildlife – Desert Tag | $145,000.00 | 90.00% | $130,500.00 | $14,500.00 |
| FR | 48 | NM Dept Game, Fish & Wildlife – Desert Bighorn | $185,000.00 | 90.00% | $166,500.00 | $18,500.00 |
| FR | 52 | AK Dept of Fish and Game – Chugach Dall’s | $235,000.00 | 100.00% | $235,000.00 | $0.00 |
| FR | 57 | MT Fish, Wildlife & Parks – Bighorn MT | $380,000.00 | 90.00% | $342,000.00 | $38,000.00 |
| SATURDAY | ||||||
| SA | 06 | Idaho Chief, Wildlife Bureau – Non Hells Canyon Bighorn | $230,000.00 | 95.00% | $218,500.00 | $11,500.00 |
| SA | 10 | Nevada Dept of Wildlife – Desert Tag | $175,000.00 | 100.00% | $175,000.00 | $0.00 |
| SA | 14 | RMBS – Colorado Rocky Mtn Bighorn | $600,000.00 | 90.00% | $540,000.00 | $60,000.00 |
| SA | 19 | Wyoming Game & Fish Department – Bighorn Tag | $190,000.00 | 90.00% | $171,000.00 | $19,000.00 |
| SA | 23 | Navajo Department of Fish & Game – Desert Bighorn | $60,000.00 | 90.00% | $54,000.00 | $6,000.00 |
| SA | 27 | Oregon Dept of Fish & Wildlife – Bighorn | $450,000.00 | 90.00% | $405,000.00 | $45,000.00 |
| SA | 32 | Mongolian Outfitters Consortium – Altai Argali | $120,000.00 | 85.00% | $102,000.00 | $18,000.00 |
| SA | 36 | BC Specialty Tag – Stones or Bighorn, or Dall’s | $430,000.00 | 85.00% | $365,500.00 | $64,500.00 |
| SA | 40 | Taos Pueblo – Rocky Mtn Bighorn | $260,000.00 | 90.00% | $234,000.00 | $26,000.00 |
| SA | 45 | NM Dept Game, Fish & Wildlife – Rocky Mtn Bighorn | $600,000.00 | 90.00% | $540,000.00 | $60,000.00 |
| SA | 49 | Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs – CA Bighorn | $230,000.00 | 0.00% | $0.00 | $230,000.00 |
| SA | 53 | Arizona Game & Fish Department – Desert Sheep | $430,000.00 | 100.00% | $430,000.00 | $0.00 |
| SA | 58 | APOS – Alberta Bighorn Permit | $320,000.00 | 90.00% | $288,000.00 | $32,000.00 |
| $6,522,500.00 | $5,747,750.00 | $774,750.00 | ||||
What sets the Wild Sheep Foundation apart is its ability to directly contribute substantial funds to state agencies for species conservation. While other organizations and foundations also raise funds for conservation efforts, the Wild Sheep Foundation’s model ensures that a significant portion of the proceeds comes from hunters themselves, demonstrating their commitment to conservation.
For instance, the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Foundation raised $3 million this year for non-game species conservation, primarily through the contributions of hunters. Similarly, the SFW – Western Hunt Expo Antelope Island tag and Arizona Strip tag also raised over $650,000, all of which will be used for restoration and conservation efforts in mule deer and elk programs in Arizona.
“It’s amazing the number of records that keep getting surpassed each year,” said Gray N. Thornton, president and CEO of the Wild Sheep Foundation. “The fact that a handful of individuals stepped up at these levels to put and keep more wild sheep on the mountain for everyone, and one day put more sheep permits into the public draws, is the definition of paying it forward. That’s the backbone of conservation.
“While some may find this type of conservation funding contrary to the North American Conservation Model, the Model’s renowned spokesman, Shane Mahoney, disagrees, noting that the Model encourages states, provinces, and tribal/First Nations to fund wildlife agencies in the most effective manner. Allowing a few individuals passionate about a wildlife species to fund the majority of an agency’s budget for that species with very limited auction and raffle permits is the most effective, keeping pace with the increasing management costs for that species.”
Such staggering figures underscore the immense impact hunters have on wildlife conservation efforts, and it’s upon hunters to share them when countering misconceptions about their contributions. It’s never easy to sway the opinions of skeptics, but engaging in respectful, fact-based discussions can help sow the seeds of understanding among a broader audience.
“Sheep hunting is tightly controlled, and rightfully so,” Thornton explained. “Wild sheep do not exist in the numbers we have for other big game species like deer and elk where revenue generated from license sales pays for their management programs. Even if everyone who drew a sheep tag were willing to pay $10,000, it wouldn’t be enough. Without auctioning a few special permits each year, some agencies would have no wild sheep programs, and others would be severely limited as to what they could do.”
The individuals who purchased sheep tags at the the Sheep Show’s auction deserve recognition and gratitude for their contributions. It’s imperative that hunters, observers, and critics are able to acknowledge the role ethical hunting plays in safeguarding our planet’s natural heritage.
